FATF ·

APG keeps Nepal's FATF ratings unchanged across eight Recommendations

APG kept Nepal partially compliant on eight FATF Recommendations, leaving its AML/CFT framework status unchanged on enhanced expedited follow-up

Change
The Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering kept Nepal's FATF Recommendation ratings unchanged, finding reform progress insufficient to upgrade any of eight requested re-ratings across targeted financial sanctions, beneficial ownership, FI and DNFBP supervision, guidance and international cooperation.
Why it matters
APG's second enhanced expedited follow-up report leaves Nepal's technical-compliance ratings unchanged: R.6, R.7, R.24, R.25, R.26, R.28, R.34 and R.40 all remain partially compliant despite acknowledged reforms including the 2024 AML Rules and amended targeted-financial-sanctions procedures. Nepal remains on enhanced expedited follow-up with 28 Recommendations compliant or largely compliant. The report assesses Nepal's national framework and directs further reform to Nepal's authorities; it creates no new operator obligation, but the unchanged status is a reference point for country-risk assessment of Nepal exposure.
Implications
  • Nepal's AML/CFT authorities and supervisors must complete the outstanding technical reforms — across targeted financial sanctions (R.6, R.7), beneficial ownership (R.24, R.25), FI and DNFBP supervision (R.26, R.28), guidance (R.34) and international cooperation (R.40) — before a future APG re-rating request can succeed, as the current progress was found insufficient.
  • Financial institutions with Nepal exposure can treat the unchanged ratings as a country-risk reference point: Nepal's framework remains only partially compliant on these eight Recommendations and stays on enhanced expedited follow-up, which firms may factor into jurisdiction-risk scoring for Nepal-linked customers and correspondents.
Who is affected
  • Nepal AML/CFT policymakers, competent authorities and financial-sector supervisors responsible for completing the outstanding reforms
  • Nepal DNFBP supervisors responsible for R.28 risk-based supervision
  • Country-risk and financial-crime teams at firms with Nepal exposure using FATF/APG status as a jurisdiction-risk input
View on FATF
Clarify this change

Grounded in this brief and its source — your questions stay private.

Clarify with AI — Pro only

You asked:

Clarify turns any brief into answers specific to your role and exposure.

Pro includes

Implications — what this change may force you to review
Who is affected — which people, workflows, or obligations are touched
What to watch — dates, deadlines, and triggers that matter next
Real-time alerts — delivered when a decision-forcing change is published
Clarify with AI — ask what this change means for you

$29/month · Founding rate, locked for life. Cancel anytime.

Create a free account to keep clarifying

You asked:

You've used your free guest questions for now. A free account gives you more every month and saves your history — or start a Pro trial for unlimited Clarify and real-time alerts.

Pro includes

Implications — what this change may force you to review
Who is affected — which people, workflows, or obligations are touched
What to watch — dates, deadlines, and triggers that matter next
Real-time alerts — delivered when a decision-forcing change is published
Clarify with AI — ask what this change means for you

Free account: no card, ever. Pro trial: $29/month after 14 days, no card to start, cancel anytime.