OFAC ·

OFAC designates Iran-linked financial firms and DR Congo individuals

Sanctions-screening teams must add six individuals and four Iran-based crypto exchange entities to SDN filters immediately — NOBITEX network carries secondary sanctions exposure affecting non-US counterparties.

Change
On 2 June 2026, OFAC added six individuals and four Iranian financial/crypto entities (BITPIN, NOBITEX, RAMZINEX, WALLEX) to the SDN List under SDGT, IRAN, and IRAN-EO13902 programmes, plus two DR Congo individuals under the DRCONGO programme.
Why it matters
The four Iranian entities are crypto exchange platforms subject to secondary sanctions under IRAN-EO13902; NOBITEX and three linked individuals additionally carry SDGT secondary sanctions risk under EO 13224. Three individuals are explicitly linked to NOBITEX in the SDN entries, creating entity-relationship screening obligations. Two DR Congo individuals (KUBWAYO and NZENZE) are designated under the DRCONGO programme for North Kivu-related activity. OFAC also issued FAQ 1257 providing updated Iran-related guidance.
Implications
  • Bank sanctions-screening teams must add all six individuals and four entities — AGHAMIR MOHAMMAD ALI (both entries), KHOEE, RAD, KUBWAYO, NZENZE, BITPIN, NOBITEX, RAMZINEX, WALLEX — to transaction and customer-screening filters before the next funds-transfer cycle.
  • Crypto-platform compliance teams must block onboarding and freeze accounts linked to BITPIN, NOBITEX, RAMZINEX, and WALLEX — all four carry secondary sanctions exposure under IRAN-EO13902, creating enforcement risk for non-US platforms that continue to service them.
  • Screening teams must apply NOBITEX entity-relationship matching for the three individuals explicitly linked to NOBITEX in the SDN entries (AGHAMIR MOHAMMAD ALI x2, KHOEE) — transactions hitting the individuals create NOBITEX network exposure.
  • KYC teams must ingest the OFAC-provided identifiers (national ID numbers, company registration numbers, website addresses, phone numbers) into match-resolution workflows — omission produces false-negative results against these SDN entries.
Who is affected
  • Bank sanctions-screening teams at correspondent and retail banks
  • Crypto-platform compliance teams and custodians
  • KYC and transaction-screening teams at payment processors
View on OFAC
Clarify with AI

Grounded in this brief. 10 free questions left this month.

Start with a decision question — or ask your own below

Clarify with AI — Pro only

You asked:

Clarify turns any brief into answers specific to your role and exposure.

Pro includes

Implications — what this change may force you to review
Who is affected — which people, workflows, or obligations are touched
What to watch — dates, deadlines, and triggers that matter next
Real-time alerts — delivered when a decision-forcing change is published
Clarify with AI — ask what this change means for you

$29/month · Founding rate, locked for life. Cancel anytime.

Create a free account to keep clarifying

You asked:

You've used your free guest questions for now. A free account gives you more every month and saves your history — or start a Pro trial for unlimited Clarify and real-time alerts.

Pro includes

Implications — what this change may force you to review
Who is affected — which people, workflows, or obligations are touched
What to watch — dates, deadlines, and triggers that matter next
Real-time alerts — delivered when a decision-forcing change is published
Clarify with AI — ask what this change means for you

Free account: no card, ever. Pro trial: $29/month after 14 days, no card to start, cancel anytime.

Awareness was never the problem. Translation is.

Your team doesn't miss the change — it loses hours turning a 60-page regulator notice into “what do we actually do.” OwlBrief delivers that as a sourced, decision-ready brief the moment a change publishes.

Get the next brief free →
Similar briefs