OFAC ·

OFAC sanctions PCC-linked Brazilian crypto and payments network and adds ISIS-K crypto addresses

US-nexus sanctions and crypto-monitoring teams must block the PCC-linked Brazilian network (incl. a Pix payments firm) and add ISIS-K's newly listed XMR and TRX addresses to on-chain screening

Change
On 1 July 2026 the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated a Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC)-linked network of two Brazilian individuals and five entities — including PixWave, a Brazilian Pix payments company — under Executive Orders 14059 and 13224, designated Ecuador's Chone Killers as a terrorist organisation, and added three Monero and over 120 Tron digital-currency addresses to the listing for ISIL-Khorasan (ISIS-K).
Why it matters
The action spans fiat and on-chain exposure. On the fiat side, OFAC blocked a PCC-linked network centred on Victor Henrique de Oliveira Shimada, with his associate and five companies — a Portuguese transport firm, a Brazilian Pix payments company (PixWave), a trading/collections-technology firm, and a construction company — designated as owned or controlled by him, so screening must run through that ownership chain and OFAC's 50% rule. On the on-chain side, OFAC attached three Monero (XMR) and more than 120 Tron (TRX) addresses to the ISIS-K listing, turning the designation into a large set of blockchain identifiers that transaction-monitoring teams must ingest. Ecuador's Chone Killers was separately designated as a terrorist organisation. All designees carry secondary-sanctions risk under E.O. 13224, exposing foreign financial institutions that knowingly facilitate significant transactions.
Implications
  • Sanctions-screening teams at US and US-nexus banks, payment firms and MSBs must add the two individuals (Victor Henrique de Oliveira Shimada; Stella Stefanie Nunes Henrique de Oliveira) and the five entities (Avenidas Flutuantes Unipessoal LDA; PixWave Solucoes de Pagamentos LTDA; Victory Trading Intermediacao de Negocios, Cobrancas e Tecnologia LTDA; Wave Construcoes Inteligentes LTDA; Chone Killers) to filters and block or reject matched transactions before the next transfer cycle.
  • Sanctions and correspondent-banking teams must screen through the ownership chain rather than by name alone: OFAC designated the four De Oliveira Shimada companies (spanning a Portuguese transport firm, a Brazilian Pix payments company, a trading/technology firm and a construction firm) and his associate as owned, controlled by, or acting for him, and the 50%-ownership rule blocks any further entity these persons own 50% or more — the PixWave Pix-payments designation is a direct flag for payment-processor and fintech counterparty exposure.
  • Crypto custody, exchange and AML transaction-monitoring teams must ingest the three Monero (XMR) and 120-plus Tron (TRX) addresses OFAC attached to the ISIL-Khorasan (ISIS-K) listing into blockchain screening, and block or reject on-chain transfers to or from those addresses in US-jurisdiction operations.
  • Compliance teams with Brazil or Ecuador exposure must treat the PCC-linked network and the newly designated Chone Killers as blocked counterparties — the designation extends US terrorist-financing and counter-narcotics screening to Latin American criminal-organisation networks and their corporate fronts.
Who is affected
  • Sanctions-screening teams at US and US-nexus banks, payment firms and MSBs
  • Correspondent-banking and counterparty due-diligence teams applying 50%-ownership screening
  • Crypto custody, exchange and AML transaction-monitoring teams
  • Payment-processor and fintech compliance teams with Brazil exposure
View on OFAC
Got Questions?

Ask what this change means — grounded in this brief. Source linked for final checks.

Clarify™ · Grounded, not generic

Why not a general AI assistant?

A general assistant will answer almost anything — including beyond what it actually knows, which is where drift and hallucination come from. Ask it the same question twice and you can get two different answers — no good when you need a record you can stand behind.

Clarify™ works differently. It answers only from the specific brief in front of you and its cited primary source. Ask something the brief doesn’t cover and it says so, rather than inventing an answer — and the same question returns a consistent, grounded answer every time. The trade-off is deliberate: narrower, but defensible enough to act on.

Clarify with AI — Pro only

You asked:

Clarify turns any brief into answers specific to your role and exposure.

Pro includes

Implications — what this change may force you to review
Who is affected — which people, workflows, or obligations are touched
What to watch — dates, deadlines, and triggers that matter next
Real-time alerts — delivered when a decision-forcing change is published
Clarify with AI — ask what this change means for you

$29/month · Founding rate, locked for life. Cancel anytime.

Create a free account to keep clarifying

You asked:

You've used your free guest questions for now. A free account gives you more every month and saves your history — or start a Pro trial for unlimited Clarify and real-time alerts.

Pro includes

Implications — what this change may force you to review
Who is affected — which people, workflows, or obligations are touched
What to watch — dates, deadlines, and triggers that matter next
Real-time alerts — delivered when a decision-forcing change is published
Clarify with AI — ask what this change means for you

Free account: no card, ever. Pro trial: $29/month after 14 days, no card to start, cancel anytime.

Awareness was never the problem. Translation is.

Your team doesn't miss the change — it loses hours turning a 60-page regulator notice into “what do we actually do.” OwlBrief delivers that as a sourced, decision-ready brief the moment a change publishes.

Get the next brief free →
Similar briefs