Key insights
-
1
Court said mass inductions could affect electoral fairness and MCA functioning: The court said the numerical increase in membership significantly altered the functioning, quorum, and voting strength of the MCA, raising constitutional concerns in substance.
-
2
Court said intervention was warranted despite the election process having begun: The court rejected the contention that no court interference was permissible once the election process had begun and said allowing the elections to proceed would perpetuate the alleged illegality.
Takeaways
The MCA election remains stayed until further orders, with the case set for further hearing on February 4, 2026.
Topics
World & Politics Elections Governance Law & Public Safety Courts