During the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) General Assembly in Abu Dhabi, members voted against a proposed moratorium on the release of genetically engineered species into the wild, supporting the use of synthetic biology instead. This decision has drawn significant criticism from Indigenous-led groups and various international organizations focused on agriculture and biodiversity, who argue that ethical safeguards and consultation protocols are essential. They emphasize the importance of free, prior, and informed consent from Indigenous communities before implementing such technologies, citing potential irreversible impacts on ecosystems. Proponents of the IUCN's decision argue that it represents a step forward in addressing biodiversity loss and climate change challenges, aiming for evidence-based policies that include Indigenous rights and leadership in conservation efforts.