Toxic emissions: how net zero became a ‘poisoned’ policy for the Coalition

The Guardian
The Guardian 3M Australia
Moderate Liberals are outraged as Nationals leader David Littleproud influences Sussan Ley to abandon net zero emissions, jeopardizing the Coalition's climate commitments. This shift could alienate moderate voters and damage the party's urban appeal.
Toxic emissions: how net zero became a ‘poisoned’ policy for the Coalition
Why it matters
The Liberal Party is facing significant internal conflict over its climate policy, particularly regarding the net zero emissions target. Following pressure from Nationals leader David Littleproud, Sussan Ley's leadership team appears poised to abandon the commitment made under previous leadership. This decision has incited anger among moderate Liberals, who worry that it will further alienate urban voters and damage the party's reputation. As the party prepares for crucial meetings to formalize its stance, there is a growing concern that the Coalition's alignment with the Nationals could lead to a more conservative approach to climate action, potentially jeopardizing the party's future electoral success. The moderates are advocating for some level of commitment to emissions reduction, fearing that a complete withdrawal from net zero could be politically disastrous.
TOPICS

World & Politics Policy & Regulation Climate & Environment Climate Change

Be prepared — without the noise

Calm, decision-grade intelligence that flags material changes before they become social knowledge—so you can update assumptions, not chase headlines.

DECISION-GRADE INTELLIGENCE

Get decision-grade intelligence in your inbox

A high-signal brief covering what changed — and what matters — delivered by email.

A handful of briefs — before your coffee gets cold.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We don’t sell your email.